Category: I-9 Compliance

When an Employee Lies on the I-9 Form


Can an employer fire an employee when they find out that information provided in the I-9 process was falsified?

Hi, I’m Jim Hacking, immigration lawyer practicing law throughout the United States out of our office here in St. Louis, Missouri. Employers contact us from time to time wondering what they should do when they find out that an employee has lied in the I-9 employment verification process. Most people who have been through the hiring process and have completed the paperwork that goes along with starting a new job are familiar with the I-9.

The I-9 is a form that the Immigration Service uses to require employers to document that an employee is who they say they are, and that they have authorization to work in the United States. You may recall that there is various columns of documents, identifying documents and documents that show that you have work authorization to allow you to be employed in the United States. Almost everybody who has ever had a job would have filled out one of these I-9s. The question then becomes, what happens when an employer finds out that the employee has lied or provided false documents and what should the employer do in that situation? Many wonder, “Can I fire the employee? Do I have to fire the employee?”

We’re shooting this video to try to explain to you what’s going on in these situations. We were doing research recently for a local company that had found out that one of their employees had lied on the I-9, and we came across a case that we found very instructive on this point. In the case that we found, there was an older Hispanic woman who had worked for a grocery store for many, many years, and she had provided false documents at the time of her hiring, and later on, when she got actual work authorization to be employed in the United States, she brought that documentation to her employer.

Here we have an employer who’s been provided two different sets of identifying documents, two different sets of work authorization cards, and the employer was really left scratching their head as to what to do. They were worried that if they fired the employee, that they could get in trouble, but they went ahead and terminated her because they had a firm-wide policy, not just with I-9s, that if you lied at all during the hiring process, it could be about a crime or your identity or any other kind of issue, if you had lied about any of that prior to your starting the work, then the employer had a blanket policy of firing those employees. The employer went ahead and fired the employee.

The employee brought a claim through the union grievance procedure against the employer saying that she was being discriminated against because of her Hispanic heritage and that now that she had proper work authorization, that that should end the inquiry, that the employer should not look back to the documents that were provided previously. Now, this case went on for a while. Both sides exchanged documents. There were depositions taken, and the case was sent to the OCAHO for review, and that agency determined that the employer had properly terminated the employee.

They found that because the company had a blanket wide policy of firing people when they are caught lying during the hiring process, that it was okay for the employer to terminate the employee at this time, even though she had valid work authorization. We conveyed that information to our client here, and they’re going to make their own determination as to whether or not they terminate this employee. These are the things that you have to keep in mind.

You need to be consistent in how you treat employees. You need to be consistent with your I-9 recording procedures. You need to make sure that your I-9s are properly documented and that you have all the Ts crossed and the Is dotted. You don’t want to do anything that messes up your I-9 system.

If you find an error on your I-9, you need to document it. You don’t ever want to erase the old I-9 information. You don’t want to destroy old I-9 information. You want to document for this particular employee everything that’s happened from start to finish so that if you ever get audited by ICE that you’re going to be able to explain adequately what it is that you did with this particular employee. I would not terminate an employee without speaking with a legal counsel and making sure that you make sure everything, do everything correctly.

If you have any questions about this, be sure to give us a call at 314-961-8200, or you can email us at

If you liked this video, please click Like on the button below and also make sure to sign up for our YouTube channel so that you get updated whenever we update one of our videos. Thanks so much and have a good day.


St. Louis Deportation Attorney Jim Hacking Discusses SEC’s Interest in Immigration Issues

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is responsible for enforcing federal securities laws and regulating the securities industry. Recently, the agency seems to have added disclosure of undocumented immigrant violations to their job description, which has made some companies nervous.

When the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) began investigating the country’s fastest-growing burrito chain, Chipotle in 2010, the employer ended up firing over 450 workers in Minnesota. These workers were unable to provide valid work documents which led to subsequent audits in several additional states.  The SEC is apparently concerned about the disclosures that publicly-traded companies are making when they undergo an ICE investigation and to make sure their disclosures are complete.  While Chipotle cooperated with the SEC by handing over 300,000 documents to the government, they claimed to be surprised when the documents were subpoenaed and investigations continued. Chipotle incurred more than $1 million in legal fees, plummeting stocks, and bad publicity for their company which made investors less than happy.

Some are concerned with the power that the SEC has placed upon itself. It is coming in to companies as more than an ethics checker, but as an overseer, accountant, and negotiator. This has led many to question if the SEC is not overstepping their boundaries by taking on this new job.

Currently, if a publicly-traded company is under investigation by ICE, “there are no express disclosure requirements related to immigration and employment.  Many qualified securities lawyers will counsel in favor of silence. Sometimes companies get in bigger trouble for speaking when they have the opportunity not to do so,”  according to Jacob Frenkal, a former SEC enforcement lawyer. The key thing to understand is that it seems that the SEC is keeping track of ICE raids on these large companies and seeks to expand the disclosures made by such companies.

Whether you are a large or small business owner, an investigation by ICE is not beneficial for any business in this economy. Working with an experienced immigration attorney to make sure that your employees’ immigration paperwork is correctly handled may help an employer avoid not only the initial ICE or Department of Labor investigation, but now apparently an SEC investigation if the company is publicly traded.

If you would like to discuss how your company might benefit from an internal review of your employee paperwork, give us a call at (314) 961-8200 today.