Click here to see how our firm is preparing for COVID-19

The Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security's Report Has Disturbing Findings

Spread the love

A special review of Trump’s “Zero Tolerance Policy” that forced 2,600 migrant children to be separated from their family members has been released from the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security.  The report is titled “Initial Observations Regarding Family Separation Issues Under the Zero Tolerance Policy.”

The report found that during the implementation of Trump’s “Zero Tolerance Policy,” Border Patrol violated the mandated limits of holding children in custody for no more than 72 hours unless there were “exceptional circumstances.”  After a maximum of 72 hours in most cases, children are to be transferred to Health and Human Services.  But, during Trump’s policy, “Border patrol data shows that the Rio Grande Valley sector exceeded the 72-hour time period for at least 564 children.”  Considering 564 children equated to 44 percent of children detained during this time, this hardly seems to be “exceptional circumstances.”

According to the Inspector General’s report, while CBP was separating migrant children from their families, they “had to supervise and take care of children” instead of “patrolling and securing the border,” i.e. what they were hired to do.

The data in the Inspector General’s report gave data on separating migrant children until September 20, 2018.  According to Rolling Stone, the report makes it clear “that the Trump administration has still not met a court order to reunify the families separated…on account of the policy.”  The data shows that 403 children that had been “deemed eligible for reunification” have not been reunited with their families.  19 of those kids are under the age of five.

Equally as disturbing, the report shows that Border Patrol has been “metering” asylum seekers.  When there is not enough space to process asylum seekers, Border Patrol would close the border.  It is not yet clear if this practice is lawful (under Federal or international law), but even if it is, it is a gross inconsideration for the. Hardships and desperation of asylum seekers to be in a place of safety.

For more information, click here.

You May Also Like

Why Do Mandamus Lawsuits Over Immigration Delays Work? Spread the love When you file an immigration petition, you expect a decision within a certain time. But sometimes, the government takes much longer than expected to make a... VIEW POST
What Can the USCIS Ombudsman Do To Speed Up Your Immigration Case? Spread the loveWaiting for your immigration case resolution can feel like a never-ending nightmare. You're not sure what's taking so long, and every day feels like an eternity. You... VIEW POST
USCIS Processing Times: A Definitive Guide Spread the loveWaiting for your green card, visa, citizenship, and other immigration processes can be stressful. With all the backlogs, government interruptions, and changing policies, you should prepare for... VIEW POST

Download Free Guide 
2022 Immigrant’s Guide to 
Becoming a U.S. Citizen

This guide contains all you need to know to become  
a U.S. citizen.

Download Free Guide 2022 Immigrant’s Guide to Becoming a U.S. Citizen

This guide contains all you need to know
to become a U.S. citizen.
DOWNLOAD FREE PDF

Immigration 
Answers Show
Live every week.

JOIN US